Sports

The 27th Conference of the Parties (COP27) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) will convene in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, to accelerate action toward the goals of the Paris Agreement and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
The science is unambiguous: climate change affects everyone. It poses a "threat to human well-being and global health" (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change WG II Report).
The effects of the climate crisis on human mobility are profound. In 2021 alone, natural disasters caused 23,7 million internal displacements (Global Report of the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, 2021). Climate action is imperative. Without early and concerted climate and development action, according to the World Bank, over 216 million people could become internal climate migrants by 2050.
We must act immediately and involve the entire society. We must bolster the resilience of the populace and transition from negotiation to implementation. We must deliver for humanity, its dignity, and future generations at COP27, at COP27, we cannot abandon anyone.

The 27th Conference of the Parties (COP27) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) will convene in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, to accelerate action toward the goals of the Paris Agreement and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
The science is unambiguous: climate change affects everyone. It poses a "threat to human well-being and global health" (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change WG II Report).
The effects of the climate crisis on human mobility are profound. In 2021 alone, natural disasters caused 23,7 million internal displacements (Global Report of the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, 2021). Climate action is imperative. Without early and concerted climate and development action, according to the World Bank, over 216 million people could become internal climate migrants by 2050.
We must act immediately and involve the entire society. We must bolster the resilience of the populace and transition from negotiation to implementation. We must deliver for humanity, its dignity, and future generations at COP27, at COP27, we cannot abandon anyone.

UN Migration Agency: ADDRESSING HUMAN MOBILITY DRIVEN BY CLIMATE CHANGE

<h5>How are countries reducing their greenhouse gas emissions?</h5>
Climate Variation Mitigation refers to the reduction or elimination of greenhouse gas emissions. Utilizing new technologies and renewable energy sources, making older equipment more energy-efficient, or modifying management practises or consumer behaviour are all examples of mitigation strategies.
Countries are expected to demonstrate how they intend to implement the Glasgow pact call, review their climate plans, and develop a mitigation work programme.
This entails presenting more ambitious 2030 emission targets, as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change has stated that current plans are insufficient to prevent catastrophic warming.
<h5>2. Adaptation: how will nations adapt and assist others in doing so?</h5>
Climate change has arrived. In addition to doing everything possible to reduce emissions and slow the rate of global warming, countries must adapt to climate consequences in order to protect their citizens.
The repercussions vary by location. It may increase the likelihood of fires, floods, droughts, warmer or colder days, and sea-level rise.
At COP26, delegates adopted a work programme for the Paris Agreement's global adaptation objective.
The plan was enacted to equip communities and nations with the knowledge and tools necessary to ensure that the adaptation actions they undertake contribute to a more climate-resilient future.
The COP27 Presidency anticipates that nations will document and evaluate their progress in enhancing resilience and assisting the most vulnerable communities. This requires countries to make more specific and ambitious adaptation commitments as part of their national climate plans.
Last year, developed countries agreed to at least double adaptation funding, and many stakeholders are now calling for even higher levels of adaptation funding to match the amounts currently spent on mitigation under the Paris Agreement. This will undoubtedly be a popular topic of conversation in Sharm el-Sheikh.
To address current and future climate risks, the UNFCCC has made it abundantly clear that the scale of adaptation finance from all sources — public and private — must be significantly increased. Governments, financial institutions, and the private sector must all participate.
<h5>The elephant that never leaves the negotiation room: Climate Finance</h5>
Climate finance will once again be a leading topic at COP27, with numerous finance-related discussions already on the agenda. Developing nations have issued a resounding call for developed nations to provide adequate financial support, especially to the most vulnerable.
We will likely hear a great deal about the annual $100 billion pledge by developed nations that is not fulfilled. In Copenhagen in 2009, wealthy nations pledged to provide this funding, but official reports indicate that this goal is not being met. Experts anticipate that COP27 will finally make this commitment a reality in 2023. This and other commitments and pledges made at previous COPs will be followed up on by the Egyptian Presidency.

How are countries reducing their greenhouse gas emissions?
Climate Variation Mitigation refers to the reduction or elimination of greenhouse gas emissions. Utilizing new technologies and renewable energy sources, making older equipment more energy-efficient, or modifying management practises or consumer behaviour are all examples of mitigation strategies.
Countries are expected to demonstrate how they intend to implement the Glasgow pact call, review their climate plans, and develop a mitigation work programme.
This entails presenting more ambitious 2030 emission targets, as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change has stated that current plans are insufficient to prevent catastrophic warming.
2. Adaptation: how will nations adapt and assist others in doing so?
Climate change has arrived. In addition to doing everything possible to reduce emissions and slow the rate of global warming, countries must adapt to climate consequences in order to protect their citizens.
The repercussions vary by location. It may increase the likelihood of fires, floods, droughts, warmer or colder days, and sea-level rise.
At COP26, delegates adopted a work programme for the Paris Agreement's global adaptation objective.
The plan was enacted to equip communities and nations with the knowledge and tools necessary to ensure that the adaptation actions they undertake contribute to a more climate-resilient future.
The COP27 Presidency anticipates that nations will document and evaluate their progress in enhancing resilience and assisting the most vulnerable communities. This requires countries to make more specific and ambitious adaptation commitments as part of their national climate plans.
Last year, developed countries agreed to at least double adaptation funding, and many stakeholders are now calling for even higher levels of adaptation funding to match the amounts currently spent on mitigation under the Paris Agreement. This will undoubtedly be a popular topic of conversation in Sharm el-Sheikh.
To address current and future climate risks, the UNFCCC has made it abundantly clear that the scale of adaptation finance from all sources — public and private — must be significantly increased. Governments, financial institutions, and the private sector must all participate.
The elephant that never leaves the negotiation room: Climate Finance
Climate finance will once again be a leading topic at COP27, with numerous finance-related discussions already on the agenda. Developing nations have issued a resounding call for developed nations to provide adequate financial support, especially to the most vulnerable.
We will likely hear a great deal about the annual $100 billion pledge by developed nations that is not fulfilled. In Copenhagen in 2009, wealthy nations pledged to provide this funding, but official reports indicate that this goal is not being met. Experts anticipate that COP27 will finally make this commitment a reality in 2023. This and other commitments and pledges made at previous COPs will be followed up on by the Egyptian Presidency.

Cop27: Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions

Loss and Damage is an important topic that will be discussed at cop27 in Sharm El-Sheikh.
<h5>Why do we constantly hear about "loss and damage"?</h5>
Extreme weather events caused by climate change, such as tropical cyclones, desertification, and rising sea levels, cause costly damage to nations.
Because the intensification of these otherwise "natural disasters" is primarily caused by the increase in greenhouse gas emissions from industrialised nations, developing nations, which are frequently the most affected, argue that they should be compensated.
Denmark made headlines during the most recent high-level week of the United Nations General Assembly after announcing that it will donate $13 million to developing nations affected by climate change.
The issue of these payments, known as "loss and damage," will likely be a major topic of discussion at COP27, even though it has not yet been formally added to the agenda.
The Group of 77 and China (which essentially consists of all developing nations) has requested that it be added to the agenda, which will require the agreement of all nations on the first day of the talks.
There have been discussions regarding the establishment of a Loss and Damage fund, but nothing concrete has occurred. Ian Fry, the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and Climate, hopes to generate additional momentum and "get it done."
"There are significant developed nations that are quite concerned about this issue and are examining it from the polluter-pays perspective. Now, the countries most impacted by climate change and suffering the associated costs must bear those costs on their own.
During a recent interview with UN News, he stated, "It's time the big countries, the major emitters, stood up and said, 'we've got to do something, we've got to contribute to these vulnerable countries.'"
<h5>How does the Ukraine conflict impact all of this?</h5>
According to Ilana Seid, Permanent Representative of Palau to the United Nations and climate negotiator, the current sociopolitical climate and energy crisis will make this COP "confusing."
"Because of the war in Ukraine, there are a great number of things that so many countries agreed to but now cannot do. The landscape has changed because of the war", she explained.
Indeed, Russia's invasion of Ukraine has caused inflation, energy, food, and supply chain crises on a global scale. Countries such as Germany have had to temporarily scale back their climate goals, and the China-US Climate Working Group that was announced in Glasgow has been suspended.
Special Rapporteur Ian Fry believes that the war could serve as a "wake-up call" for countries to become energy independent.
He argues that renewables, which are essential for reducing emissions, are the most cost-effective way to achieve this.
"We're seeing Portugal move toward 100 percent renewable energy, and we know Denmark is doing the same," he told UN News. "I believe this will convince other nations of the need to be renewable and energy independent."

Loss and Damage is an important topic that will be discussed at cop27 in Sharm El-Sheikh.
Why do we constantly hear about "loss and damage"?
Extreme weather events caused by climate change, such as tropical cyclones, desertification, and rising sea levels, cause costly damage to nations.
Because the intensification of these otherwise "natural disasters" is primarily caused by the increase in greenhouse gas emissions from industrialised nations, developing nations, which are frequently the most affected, argue that they should be compensated.
Denmark made headlines during the most recent high-level week of the United Nations General Assembly after announcing that it will donate $13 million to developing nations affected by climate change.
The issue of these payments, known as "loss and damage," will likely be a major topic of discussion at COP27, even though it has not yet been formally added to the agenda.
The Group of 77 and China (which essentially consists of all developing nations) has requested that it be added to the agenda, which will require the agreement of all nations on the first day of the talks.
There have been discussions regarding the establishment of a Loss and Damage fund, but nothing concrete has occurred. Ian Fry, the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and Climate, hopes to generate additional momentum and "get it done."
"There are significant developed nations that are quite concerned about this issue and are examining it from the polluter-pays perspective. Now, the countries most impacted by climate change and suffering the associated costs must bear those costs on their own.
During a recent interview with UN News, he stated, "It's time the big countries, the major emitters, stood up and said, 'we've got to do something, we've got to contribute to these vulnerable countries.'"
How does the Ukraine conflict impact all of this?
According to Ilana Seid, Permanent Representative of Palau to the United Nations and climate negotiator, the current sociopolitical climate and energy crisis will make this COP "confusing."
"Because of the war in Ukraine, there are a great number of things that so many countries agreed to but now cannot do. The landscape has changed because of the war", she explained.
Indeed, Russia's invasion of Ukraine has caused inflation, energy, food, and supply chain crises on a global scale. Countries such as Germany have had to temporarily scale back their climate goals, and the China-US Climate Working Group that was announced in Glasgow has been suspended.
Special Rapporteur Ian Fry believes that the war could serve as a "wake-up call" for countries to become energy independent.
He argues that renewables, which are essential for reducing emissions, are the most cost-effective way to achieve this.
"We're seeing Portugal move toward 100 percent renewable energy, and we know Denmark is doing the same," he told UN News. "I believe this will convince other nations of the need to be renewable and energy independent."

Cop27: Loss and Damage

A year after more than 140 countries pledged to end deforestation by 2030, experts report that little has been done to finance protections or pass new conservation laws.
The pledge received widespread praise at the COP26 climate summit last year, especially since Brazil, Indonesia, and Congo all signed on. Together, the three countries contain more than fifty percent of the world's tropical rainforests.
"What happened to these promises? Are we in a position to meet them? The brief response is no, "Last month, Erin Matson coordinated the production of the Forest Declaration Assessment report by non-profits.
To fulfil the commitment, the world must reduce deforestation by 10% annually on average from 2021 to 2030. In contrast, deforestation decreased by only 6.3% in 2012, as two of the three rainforest nations experienced early setbacks.
Using data from the Global Forest Watch monitoring project, the report examines developments in financing, conservation legislation, and sustainable food production.
The majority of signatories have yet to detail their plans for passing or implementing stronger forest protections. Global funding for the goal is approximately $2.3 billion per year, which is significantly less than the $460 billion per year that the assessment indicates is required.
Experts hope that the COP27 conference in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, next week will encourage more investment from companies and nations seeking to offset their emissions by preserving and replanting forests.
According to Laura Albuquerque, a senior manager at the consulting firm WayCarbon, negotiators at the summit will work to finalise the rules for global offsets trading with the goal of having the system operational by 2025. If no agreement is reached at COP27, the timeline will be delayed by at least one year.
She stated that "COP will send an important signal to the forest sector" It is of vital importance for attracting investment.
<h5>BRAZIL</h5>
The largest rainforest nation also leads the world in deforestation, as illegal logging, agriculture, and land speculation rapidly deforest the Amazon.
Since right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro took office in 2019, environmental protections have been weakened and the region is being developed. Despite this, Bolsonaro's administration pledged last year to end deforestation in Brazil by 2028.
Preliminary government data indicates that Brazil's forest clearance will increase by another 23% in 2022, after reaching a 15-year high in 2021.
Environmentalists and scientists are optimistic that the situation will improve following the election of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who pledges to take a variety of measures to combat deforestation and climate change, last month. However, the world must exert pressure on Lula to make these changes, they said.
"International community pressure on Lula is equally welcome," said Rita Mesquita, an ecologist with Brazil's National Institute of Amazonian Research. We must achieve zero deforestation.
Lula plans to attend COP27 prior to assuming office in January in an effort to reestablish Brazil's leadership on deforestation and climate change, according to his advisors who spoke with Reuters.
According to them, the president will work immediately to protect the Amazon, including increasing Bolsonaro's cut deforestation resources.
"The commitment is to reverse the trend by 2023," Izabella Teixeira, former environment minister under Lula, told Reuters. "This will require a great deal of effort."
According to the U.N. Food and Agricultural Association, the Democratic Republic of Congo's deforestation rate over the past two decades has been the highest in its history, driven by poverty and lawlessness.
With the second-largest rainforest in the world, Congo has struggled to prevent tree cutting for firewood, subsistence farming, illegal logging, and even industrial development.
The government promised to improve forest protections after COP26, but has yet to demonstrate any concrete efforts to do so. Instead, Congo drew international condemnation for its plan to allow oil and gas drilling in virgin rainforest and carbon-rich peatlands.
"Without an energy policy, deforestation is at its peak in the provinces," said Guillaume Tshitende, a research scientist at Kolwezi University.
<h5>INDONESIA</h5>
Only Indonesia has managed to reduce deforestation among the three rainforest nations over the past year, continuing a six-year trend that has been encouraged by market forces, business pressure, and improvements in law enforcement and forest management.
Comparing the period from July 2021 to June 2022, deforestation decreased 1.3% to 1,135 square kilometres (439 square miles).
In 2019, the government ceased issuing permits for primary forest and peatland clearance for plantations and logging. In the first seven months of the year, deforestation caused by land clearance for palm oil plantations slowed even as palm oil prices soared.
Norway also agreed in September to pay Indonesia to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions by protecting its forests and peatlands, as Indonesia works to restore the area as a "carbon sink" that would absorb more CO2 than it emits.

A year after more than 140 countries pledged to end deforestation by 2030, experts report that little has been done to finance protections or pass new conservation laws.
The pledge received widespread praise at the COP26 climate summit last year, especially since Brazil, Indonesia, and Congo all signed on. Together, the three countries contain more than fifty percent of the world's tropical rainforests.
"What happened to these promises? Are we in a position to meet them? The brief response is no, "Last month, Erin Matson coordinated the production of the Forest Declaration Assessment report by non-profits.
To fulfil the commitment, the world must reduce deforestation by 10% annually on average from 2021 to 2030. In contrast, deforestation decreased by only 6.3% in 2012, as two of the three rainforest nations experienced early setbacks.
Using data from the Global Forest Watch monitoring project, the report examines developments in financing, conservation legislation, and sustainable food production.
The majority of signatories have yet to detail their plans for passing or implementing stronger forest protections. Global funding for the goal is approximately $2.3 billion per year, which is significantly less than the $460 billion per year that the assessment indicates is required.
Experts hope that the COP27 conference in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, next week will encourage more investment from companies and nations seeking to offset their emissions by preserving and replanting forests.
According to Laura Albuquerque, a senior manager at the consulting firm WayCarbon, negotiators at the summit will work to finalise the rules for global offsets trading with the goal of having the system operational by 2025. If no agreement is reached at COP27, the timeline will be delayed by at least one year.
She stated that "COP will send an important signal to the forest sector" It is of vital importance for attracting investment.
BRAZIL
The largest rainforest nation also leads the world in deforestation, as illegal logging, agriculture, and land speculation rapidly deforest the Amazon.
Since right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro took office in 2019, environmental protections have been weakened and the region is being developed. Despite this, Bolsonaro's administration pledged last year to end deforestation in Brazil by 2028.
Preliminary government data indicates that Brazil's forest clearance will increase by another 23% in 2022, after reaching a 15-year high in 2021.
Environmentalists and scientists are optimistic that the situation will improve following the election of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who pledges to take a variety of measures to combat deforestation and climate change, last month. However, the world must exert pressure on Lula to make these changes, they said.
"International community pressure on Lula is equally welcome," said Rita Mesquita, an ecologist with Brazil's National Institute of Amazonian Research. We must achieve zero deforestation.
Lula plans to attend COP27 prior to assuming office in January in an effort to reestablish Brazil's leadership on deforestation and climate change, according to his advisors who spoke with Reuters.
According to them, the president will work immediately to protect the Amazon, including increasing Bolsonaro's cut deforestation resources.
"The commitment is to reverse the trend by 2023," Izabella Teixeira, former environment minister under Lula, told Reuters. "This will require a great deal of effort."
According to the U.N. Food and Agricultural Association, the Democratic Republic of Congo's deforestation rate over the past two decades has been the highest in its history, driven by poverty and lawlessness.
With the second-largest rainforest in the world, Congo has struggled to prevent tree cutting for firewood, subsistence farming, illegal logging, and even industrial development.
The government promised to improve forest protections after COP26, but has yet to demonstrate any concrete efforts to do so. Instead, Congo drew international condemnation for its plan to allow oil and gas drilling in virgin rainforest and carbon-rich peatlands.
"Without an energy policy, deforestation is at its peak in the provinces," said Guillaume Tshitende, a research scientist at Kolwezi University.
INDONESIA
Only Indonesia has managed to reduce deforestation among the three rainforest nations over the past year, continuing a six-year trend that has been encouraged by market forces, business pressure, and improvements in law enforcement and forest management.
Comparing the period from July 2021 to June 2022, deforestation decreased 1.3% to 1,135 square kilometres (439 square miles).
In 2019, the government ceased issuing permits for primary forest and peatland clearance for plantations and logging. In the first seven months of the year, deforestation caused by land clearance for palm oil plantations slowed even as palm oil prices soared.
Norway also agreed in September to pay Indonesia to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions by protecting its forests and peatlands, as Indonesia works to restore the area as a "carbon sink" that would absorb more CO2 than it emits.

The deforestation pledge made last year is off to a slow start

In September, the Prime Minister of Barbados, Mia Amor Mottley, addressed the United Nations General Assembly passionately on the subject of the escalating debt burdened by many developing nations and its impact on their ability to thrive.
In 2020, the average debt of low- and middle-income countries, excluding China, increased from 26% to 42% of their gross national income. In Latin America and the Caribbean, debt service payments accounted for an average of 30 percent of annual exports.
Simultaneously, these nations face the "triple crisis of climate change, pandemic, and now the conflict that is causing inflationary pressures that regrettably lead to people taking matters into their own hands," according to Mottley.
As a result of rising borrowing costs, high inflation, and sluggish economic growth, developing nations like hers are in a precarious position regarding climate change. Countries with high levels of debt have fewer resources for mitigating and adapting to climate change. However, climate change is increasing their vulnerability, which can increase their sovereign risk and thus their borrowing costs. Declining productive capacity and tax base can increase the likelihood of incurring debt. A vicious cycle exists.
Countries and international organisations are discussing "debt-for-climate swaps" as a means of addressing both issues concurrently. Amina Mohammed, Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations, mentioned debt-for-climate swaps as one option for refinancing countries' "crippling" debt prior to the November 6-18, 2022 U.N. Climate Change Conference.
<h5>How debt swaps work</h5>
Debt-for-climate swaps permit countries to reduce their debt obligations in exchange for a promise to finance domestic climate projects with the released funds.
Since the late 1980s, they have been utilised to preserve the environment and address the liquidity crisis in developing nations such as Bolivia, Costa Rica, and Belize. These are typically referred to as "debt-for-nature swaps."
Under a complex debt-for-nature swap, Belize was able to reduce its debt in exchange for committing to designate 30% of its marine areas as protected areas and to spend $4 million annually for the next two decades on marine conservation.
The swap, arranged by The Nature Conservancy in 2021, entails the U.S.-based environmental organisation lending Belize funds at a low interest rate to buy back $553 million in commercial debt at a 45% discount. The Nature Conservancy raised funds from Credit Swisse through the issuance of "blue bonds" backed by the United States government, which gave the bonds an investment-grade credit rating.
Similarly, Costa Rica and the United States have completed two debt-for-nature swaps. Under the terms of the swaps, Costa Rica committed $53 million to conservation projects. It has already reverted its deforestation and planted over 60,000 trees.
Although debt-for-nature swaps have primarily been used for conservation, the same concept could be applied to climate change mitigation and adaptation activities, such as the construction of solar farms or sea walls. Some finance experts have suggested that debt-for-climate swaps could be structured in a way that would also encourage private-sector bondholders to exchange their holdings of national debt for carbon offsets.
<h5>Three requisites for effective debt-for-climate swaps</h5>
I am a member of the Climate Policy Lab at Tufts University's Fletcher School. Our experience with debt swaps can inform the design and implementation of climate-debt swaps.
First, the complexity of debt swaps' governance structures has limited their use. From 1987 to 2003, transactions were typically small, generating only about $1 billion in funding for the environment. A term sheet template for future debt-for-climate-change swaps could reduce the complexity and time and costs associated with these transactions.
Second, debt-for-climate swaps must alleviate the debt burden sufficiently to enable debtor nations to invest in climate adaptation and mitigation projects. In 2009, the United States created debt-for-nature swaps with Indonesia that were criticised for not doing enough to assist the Indonesian government in achieving its conservation objectives.
Another concern is referred to as "additionality" – ensuring that the swaps result in additional climate efforts, as opposed to efforts that have already been planned or paid for with international climate finance.
Debt-for-climate swaps can be a significant source of funding due to the widening gap between the amount of adaptation assistance reaching countries and the amount they need. Climate Policy Initiative, a non-profit research organisation, recently estimated that approximately 90 percent of the adaptation needs countries listed in their Nationally Determined Contributions – the climate change plans they submit to the United Nations – can only be met with assistance from development banks or other nations.
<h5>Experimenting regions with debt swaps</h5>
Several regions are evaluating debt-for-climate-change swaps.
In its Climate/Sustainable Development Goal Debt Swap, the Economic and Social Commission for Western Africa acts as a liaison between creditors and seven pilot countries. The initiative focuses on advancing sustainable development and climate objectives, including the creation of a more resilient agricultural sector.
Similarly, the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean plans to launch a Debt for Climate Adaptation Swap as part of the Caribbean Resilience Fund. Similar to Belize's debt swap, it aims to reduce the $527 million in debt in three pilot countries by issuing green bonds. By guaranteeing new bonds and lowering the credit risk, development banks would play a crucial role.
With carefully crafted debt-for-climate swaps and the assistance of international institutions, developing countries could increase their financing for urgently required climate mitigation and adaptation actions and reduce a portion of their heavy debt burden.

In September, the Prime Minister of Barbados, Mia Amor Mottley, addressed the United Nations General Assembly passionately on the subject of the escalating debt burdened by many developing nations and its impact on their ability to thrive.
In 2020, the average debt of low- and middle-income countries, excluding China, increased from 26% to 42% of their gross national income. In Latin America and the Caribbean, debt service payments accounted for an average of 30 percent of annual exports.
Simultaneously, these nations face the "triple crisis of climate change, pandemic, and now the conflict that is causing inflationary pressures that regrettably lead to people taking matters into their own hands," according to Mottley.
As a result of rising borrowing costs, high inflation, and sluggish economic growth, developing nations like hers are in a precarious position regarding climate change. Countries with high levels of debt have fewer resources for mitigating and adapting to climate change. However, climate change is increasing their vulnerability, which can increase their sovereign risk and thus their borrowing costs. Declining productive capacity and tax base can increase the likelihood of incurring debt. A vicious cycle exists.
Countries and international organisations are discussing "debt-for-climate swaps" as a means of addressing both issues concurrently. Amina Mohammed, Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations, mentioned debt-for-climate swaps as one option for refinancing countries' "crippling" debt prior to the November 6-18, 2022 U.N. Climate Change Conference.
How debt swaps work
Debt-for-climate swaps permit countries to reduce their debt obligations in exchange for a promise to finance domestic climate projects with the released funds.
Since the late 1980s, they have been utilised to preserve the environment and address the liquidity crisis in developing nations such as Bolivia, Costa Rica, and Belize. These are typically referred to as "debt-for-nature swaps."
Under a complex debt-for-nature swap, Belize was able to reduce its debt in exchange for committing to designate 30% of its marine areas as protected areas and to spend $4 million annually for the next two decades on marine conservation.
The swap, arranged by The Nature Conservancy in 2021, entails the U.S.-based environmental organisation lending Belize funds at a low interest rate to buy back $553 million in commercial debt at a 45% discount. The Nature Conservancy raised funds from Credit Swisse through the issuance of "blue bonds" backed by the United States government, which gave the bonds an investment-grade credit rating.
Similarly, Costa Rica and the United States have completed two debt-for-nature swaps. Under the terms of the swaps, Costa Rica committed $53 million to conservation projects. It has already reverted its deforestation and planted over 60,000 trees.
Although debt-for-nature swaps have primarily been used for conservation, the same concept could be applied to climate change mitigation and adaptation activities, such as the construction of solar farms or sea walls. Some finance experts have suggested that debt-for-climate swaps could be structured in a way that would also encourage private-sector bondholders to exchange their holdings of national debt for carbon offsets.
Three requisites for effective debt-for-climate swaps
I am a member of the Climate Policy Lab at Tufts University's Fletcher School. Our experience with debt swaps can inform the design and implementation of climate-debt swaps.
First, the complexity of debt swaps' governance structures has limited their use. From 1987 to 2003, transactions were typically small, generating only about $1 billion in funding for the environment. A term sheet template for future debt-for-climate-change swaps could reduce the complexity and time and costs associated with these transactions.
Second, debt-for-climate swaps must alleviate the debt burden sufficiently to enable debtor nations to invest in climate adaptation and mitigation projects. In 2009, the United States created debt-for-nature swaps with Indonesia that were criticised for not doing enough to assist the Indonesian government in achieving its conservation objectives.
Another concern is referred to as "additionality" – ensuring that the swaps result in additional climate efforts, as opposed to efforts that have already been planned or paid for with international climate finance.
Debt-for-climate swaps can be a significant source of funding due to the widening gap between the amount of adaptation assistance reaching countries and the amount they need. Climate Policy Initiative, a non-profit research organisation, recently estimated that approximately 90 percent of the adaptation needs countries listed in their Nationally Determined Contributions – the climate change plans they submit to the United Nations – can only be met with assistance from development banks or other nations.
Experimenting regions with debt swaps
Several regions are evaluating debt-for-climate-change swaps.
In its Climate/Sustainable Development Goal Debt Swap, the Economic and Social Commission for Western Africa acts as a liaison between creditors and seven pilot countries. The initiative focuses on advancing sustainable development and climate objectives, including the creation of a more resilient agricultural sector.
Similarly, the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean plans to launch a Debt for Climate Adaptation Swap as part of the Caribbean Resilience Fund. Similar to Belize's debt swap, it aims to reduce the $527 million in debt in three pilot countries by issuing green bonds. By guaranteeing new bonds and lowering the credit risk, development banks would play a crucial role.
With carefully crafted debt-for-climate swaps and the assistance of international institutions, developing countries could increase their financing for urgently required climate mitigation and adaptation actions and reduce a portion of their heavy debt burden.

COP27: climate swaps can help low-income countries solve their crushing debt and their environmental problems 

Due to the absence of a resolution at COP26 and Egypt's commitment to focusing on financing for adaptation and loss and damage, the issue will be discussed this year.
The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions anticipates that discussions will centre on institutional arrangements for the Santiago Network for Loss and Damage, which focuses on providing technical assistance to developing countries to minimise loss and damage, and on refining the Glasgow Dialogue, a formal process developed in 2021 to bring countries together to discuss loss and damage funding.
In October 2022, the V20 group of finance ministers, representing 58 countries highly vulnerable to climate change, and the G-7 group of wealthy nations also reached an agreement on the Global Shield Against Climate Risks financial mechanism. The Global Shield focuses on providing risk insurance and rapid financial assistance to countries following natural disasters, but its role in international discussions is unclear. Some organisations are concerned that relying on insurance systems may overlook the poorest individuals and detract from the larger discussion of establishing a dedicated fund for loss and damage.
Two aspects of the reluctance of developed nations to formalise a loss and damage mechanism are the determination of which nations or communities are eligible for compensation and the limitations of such a mechanism.
What would a loss and damage eligibility threshold look like? Limiting countries or communities' ability to receive compensation for loss and damage on the basis of their current emissions or gross domestic product could become a problematic and convoluted procedure. The majority of experts advise determining eligibility based on climate vulnerability, but this can be challenging.
<h5>How will global leaders react?</h5>
In excess of a decade ago, developed nations pledged to provide $100 billion annually to developing nations for adaptation and mitigation. However, they have been slow to fulfil this commitment, and it does not cover the damages caused by the climate impacts that the world is currently experiencing.
Establishing a loss and damage mechanism is considered one means of redressing climate injustice on a global scale. On November 6-18, 2022, all eyes will be on Egypt to see how world leaders respond.

Due to the absence of a resolution at COP26 and Egypt's commitment to focusing on financing for adaptation and loss and damage, the issue will be discussed this year.
The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions anticipates that discussions will centre on institutional arrangements for the Santiago Network for Loss and Damage, which focuses on providing technical assistance to developing countries to minimise loss and damage, and on refining the Glasgow Dialogue, a formal process developed in 2021 to bring countries together to discuss loss and damage funding.
In October 2022, the V20 group of finance ministers, representing 58 countries highly vulnerable to climate change, and the G-7 group of wealthy nations also reached an agreement on the Global Shield Against Climate Risks financial mechanism. The Global Shield focuses on providing risk insurance and rapid financial assistance to countries following natural disasters, but its role in international discussions is unclear. Some organisations are concerned that relying on insurance systems may overlook the poorest individuals and detract from the larger discussion of establishing a dedicated fund for loss and damage.
Two aspects of the reluctance of developed nations to formalise a loss and damage mechanism are the determination of which nations or communities are eligible for compensation and the limitations of such a mechanism.
What would a loss and damage eligibility threshold look like? Limiting countries or communities' ability to receive compensation for loss and damage on the basis of their current emissions or gross domestic product could become a problematic and convoluted procedure. The majority of experts advise determining eligibility based on climate vulnerability, but this can be challenging.
How will global leaders react?
In excess of a decade ago, developed nations pledged to provide $100 billion annually to developing nations for adaptation and mitigation. However, they have been slow to fulfil this commitment, and it does not cover the damages caused by the climate impacts that the world is currently experiencing.
Establishing a loss and damage mechanism is considered one means of redressing climate injustice on a global scale. On November 6-18, 2022, all eyes will be on Egypt to see how world leaders respond.

What loss and damage payments in cop27 might look like?

The organizing committee of the World Youth Forum undertakes the organizing of the Climate Change Conference events in Sharm El-Sheikh

The organizing committee of the Climate Change Summit (COP27) is receiving 7000 guests from all around the world in Sharm El-Sheikh

Sessions of the World Youth Forum on the sidelines of the Climate Summit

The organizing committee holds the responsibility of organizing the the logistical and organizational events and operations of the UN Framework Climate Change Conference (UNFCCC) (COP27), which takes place in Sharm El-Sheikh during the period 6-18 November 2022.&nbsp;
The organizing committee works on employing the accumulated experience gained by its members, who participated in the management and organization of the previous four editions of the World Youth Forum (WYF). They also participated in organizing many major international events and conferences hosted by Egypt.
Around 2000 volunteers are participating in organizing the climate conference (COP27) that Egypt hosts in the city of peace “Sharm El-Sheikh”. Among them are youth from the Presidential Leadership Program, university youth, and youth from different sectors, in addition to the participating youth from different nationalities in organizing the conference. Moreover, several organizers are cooperating with the United Nations in organizing the events at the Blue Zone at the climate summit.
The organizing committee manages the organizational and logistical operations through three central rooms at the Blue and Green Zones, which rely on a smart electronic system that links different agencies, ministries and institutions that are participating in the conference.
The responsibilities and missions of the organizing committee vary between organizing, registration, operations and crisis management, content, media production, public relations, logistics, and events. In addition, the organizing committee responds to all the inquiries of the participants and assist them as soon as they arrive at the Sharm El -Sheikh International Airport and finalize their hosting operations at the hotels, to ensure that they obtain a distinguished experience in the city of peace “Sharm El-Sheikh”, in coordination with all the concerned authorities in Sharm El-Sheikh.&nbsp;

The organizing committee holds the responsibility of organizing the the logistical and organizational events and operations of the UN Framework Climate Change Conference (UNFCCC) (COP27), which takes place in Sharm El-Sheikh during the period 6-18 November 2022. 
The organizing committee works on employing the accumulated experience gained by its members, who participated in the management and organization of the previous four editions of the World Youth Forum (WYF). They also participated in organizing many major international events and conferences hosted by Egypt.
Around 2000 volunteers are participating in organizing the climate conference (COP27) that Egypt hosts in the city of peace “Sharm El-Sheikh”. Among them are youth from the Presidential Leadership Program, university youth, and youth from different sectors, in addition to the participating youth from different nationalities in organizing the conference. Moreover, several organizers are cooperating with the United Nations in organizing the events at the Blue Zone at the climate summit.
The organizing committee manages the organizational and logistical operations through three central rooms at the Blue and Green Zones, which rely on a smart electronic system that links different agencies, ministries and institutions that are participating in the conference.
The responsibilities and missions of the organizing committee vary between organizing, registration, operations and crisis management, content, media production, public relations, logistics, and events. In addition, the organizing committee responds to all the inquiries of the participants and assist them as soon as they arrive at the Sharm El -Sheikh International Airport and finalize their hosting operations at the hotels, to ensure that they obtain a distinguished experience in the city of peace “Sharm El-Sheikh”, in coordination with all the concerned authorities in Sharm El-Sheikh. 

القاهرة الاخبارية

The organizing committee of the World Youth Forum undertakes the organizing of the Climate Change Conference events in Sharm El-Sheikh

UN Migration Agency: ADDRESSING HUMAN MOBILITY DRIVEN BY CLIMATE CHANGE

Cop27: Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions

Cop27: Loss and Damage

The deforestation pledge made last year is off to a slow start

COP27: climate swaps can help low-income countries solve their crushing debt and their environmental problems

What loss and damage payments in cop27 might look like?

Sports

Latest News

The organizing committee of the World Youth Forum undertakes the organizing of the Climate Change Conference events in Sharm El-Sheikh

The organizing committee of the Climate Change Summit (COP27) is receiving 7000 guests from all around the world in Sharm El-Sheikh

Sessions of the World Youth Forum on the sidelines of the Climate Summit